tutawei.blogg.se

Ck2 wrong type of holding in demesne
Ck2 wrong type of holding in demesne







ck2 wrong type of holding in demesne ck2 wrong type of holding in demesne ck2 wrong type of holding in demesne ck2 wrong type of holding in demesne

The penalties for holding the wrong holding type are so bad, in fact, that we'll get just as much tax from the city by handing it over to a new mayor as we would by holding onto it ourselves. The second warning is a reminder that we have a wrong holding type in our demesne - the city of Waterford. It would be nice to keep our holdings consolidated under a single ruler if possible, so we'll try to do something about this later. One warns that our second son, Donnchad, will inherit the county of Ormond and city of Waterford upon our death, leaving our first son Brian with Thomond. Once we recover from our last war, we should have more than enough men to take to the field against the count of Desmond. Our maximum raisable levies are much higher now, too. Our yearly income is a bit higher now, but impacted negatively by our poor relationships with our mayor and bishops. Its hard to say what the old Lord Mayor was thinking, but he'll have plenty of time to ruminate over his mistakes in our dungeon. There's actually more boats there than people, which is kind of a questionable decision. Its totally disgusting, its nothing but mud and boats, there's no walls or buildings or anything. And frankly, I don't think we'd want to live in Ragnvald's old city anyway. As a feudal lord, castles are our preferred holding type. With these assets at our disposal, we should be able to rein the count of Desmond in as well.Īnd since we've taken a castle for ourselves in Ormond, it automatically becomes the county capital in place of Waterford. The county of Ormond and two of its holdings are now within our demesne. Part 4: Ragnvald's Shameful City 1073 - 1086









Ck2 wrong type of holding in demesne